Water Planning Tools

>> critical times <> practical measures <<

Archive for public participation

Murray-Darling Authority Hosts Regional Planning Forum

Poh-Ling Tan and John Mackenzie from the Water Planning Tools project gave a presentation to the planning staff of the Murray Darling Basin Authority on 27th November, 2008. The presentation was the keynote address as part of a forum on regional planning hosted by the Authority to gather insights and learnings for the development of the Basin Plan.

The requirement of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority to orchestrate the development of a basin-wide water resource plan has instigated what can only be described as the most contentious and ambitious planning exercise ever undertaken in Australia. Under the Australian Commonwealth’s Water Act 2007, the Authority is to prepare a strategic plan – to be known as the Basin Plan – for the integrated and sustainable management of water resources in the Murray-Darling Basin. Although the complexity of this exercise will require an unprecedented level of co-ordination and collaboration in resource planning, the ten years of accumulated experience in water planning across the country promise a wealth of learnings that may contribute to its overall success.

The presentation focused on the key lessons for regional planning as revealed from the project’s research into large-scale water planning. These lessons included:

  1. Community expectations will be for an inclusive, transparent and equitable engagement processes, in exchange for their investment of time, energy and expense
  2. Clarity around the process, role and rationale of  community participation and involvement in the development of the Basin Plan will be necessary for effective collaboration.
  3. The scope of community involvement should distinguish between collaboration and seeking feedback on pre-determined outcomes in the preparation phase of the Basin Plan.
  4. Participant commitment to the process and the opportunities for social learning in the basin will depend on the extent of meaningful input into the decision-making process.
  5. There is an identified need for improved methods for making trade-offs in water allocation decisions in a collaborative way.
  6. The absence of adequate Indigenous participation and representation remains a key issue and impediment to effective planning.
  7. Integrating the diverse forms of knowledge required of the planning process, particularly the scientific, local and cultural knowledges, will be a complex and challenging aspect of reaching transparent allocation decisions.
  8. Water planning agencies in general are not convinced of the benefits of a properly conducted collaborative process – but for reasons of fairness, equity and pragmatism, the Basin Plan will require the insights into complex issues brought about through the integration of multiple stakeholders’ perspectives.

Designer Carrots: The National Market-Based Instruments Forum

John Mackenzie from the Collaborative Water Planning Project delivered a presentation at the Designer Carrots: National Market-Based Instruments Forum on the role of social research in the development and delivery of market-based approaches to resource management. John’s presentation highlighted the importance of understanding social drivers, values and aspirations as the basis for enhancing participation in market-based instruments (or MBIs). He also explored established techniques of communication and social marketing for improving the design and delivery of MBIs for the achievement of desired resource condition improvements.

More information on the Designer Carrots National Forum

About Designer Carrots

The Designer Carrots program arose out of the National Market Based Instruments (MBIs) Pilot Program Round Two selection process. During the selection process, the selection advisory panel identified the need for a National MBI Capacity Building Program as they felt additional capacity building was essential to increase the potential for widespread success of well-designed MBIs for natural resource management (NRM).

The $1.2 million national MBI Capacity Building Program, which runs under the banner of Designer Carrots, is developing a number of products to help regional NRM groups and government policy makers build their capacity to better understand and use MBIs as an incentive to encourage land managers to implement best practice NRM.

More on Designer Carrots

International River Symposium

Two researchers from the Collaborative Water Planning Project are presenting the key findings on risk and community participation for water planning at this week’s 11th International Riversymposium – an event held as part of Brisbane’s Riverfestival.

More Seats, More Tables: Methods for enhancing public participation in water planning & management

John Mackenzie

The proliferation of tools, tool-kits and tool-boxes for community participation presents a series of dilemmas for contemporary water management practioners looking to engage the community in water management. How are we to decide which approach is right for different circumstances, different planning needs and with different sectors of the community? This presentation explores the development of a fit-for-purpose framework for community participation, which attempts to outline how to select from the range of engagement approaches available based on needs assessment and adaptive management methodologies.

The Risk in Water Planning

Claudia Baldwin & Mark Hampstead

Water planning is a key means of achieving the objectives of Australia’s National Water Initiative and one of the most important tools for achieving sustainable use of water. It is also a critical vehicle for consideration of climate variability and climate change in planning and managing for future use and environmental protection. This paper draws from our review of water allocation planning in Australia, undertaken for National Water Commission in the latter half of 2007. The review gathered information from documents, planners and stakeholders to identify best practices and lessons learned. Eleven case studies from States and the Northern Territory were used to illustrate the strengths and challenges of planning processes in delivering desired outcomes. The focus in this paper is on how governments in Australia have addressed climate variability and climate change in water planning to date. We review current approaches to managing climate risks and suggest a range of options for responding to this challenge within the water planning framework. In doing so, we explore risk assessment, future scenario development, contingency planning and adaptive management and highlight the role for transparency, public involvement, and assessment of possible impacts through this process.

About The International RiverSymposium

The International Riversymposium is part of Riverfestival – Brisbane’s community and environmental festival celebrating our waterways and culture by focusing on the city’s signature natural landmark, the Brisbane River. The festival is 10 days of a diverse program at the start of spring with music, visual arts, film, forums, education projects, dining, culture, large-scale free outdoor events and recreation.

More on the Riversymposium…

Ord Water Resource Plan

As part of the retrospective analysis of Phase One of the Collaborative Water Planning Project, the water resource plan for the Ord Case study region was reviewed.

Download the Water Planning in the Ord River Report (PDF, 1.03MB)

In this report, the collaborative components of the water planning process in the Ord River of Western Australia are considered against four criteria for the effectiveness of collaboration:

  • as a mechanism of improved decision-making, including governance, due process and the reconcilliation of competing knowledge claims
  • as a facilitator of social process, including improving social learning, relationships and mitigating conflict
  • as a means of improving outcomes, including efficiency, equity, and social perception
  • as a pathway for catalytic changes in the community

On the basis of this analysis, the report documents a series of barriers and enablers experienced by water planners and the community for enhancing the collaborative nature of water planning.

Download the Water Planning in the Ord River Report (PDF, 1.03MB)

External Links

Western Australian Department of Water Ord River Water Resource Plan

Queensland Gulf Catchments Water Resource Plan

As part of the retrospective analysis of Phase One, the project reviewed the water planning process in the Gulf of Carpentaria undertaken between 2003 and 2007 by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water.

Download the Water Planning in the Gulf of Carpentaria Report (PDF, 1.13MB)

In this report, the collaborative components of the water planning process in the Gulf are considered against four criteria for the effectiveness of collaboration:

  • as a mechanism of improved decision-making, including governance, due process and the reconcilliation of competing knowledge claims
  • as a facilitator of social process, including improving social learning, relationships and mitigating conflict
  • as a means of improving outcomes, including efficiency, equity, and social perception
  • as a pathway for catalytic changes in the community

On the basis of this analysis, the report documents a series of barriers and enablers experienced by water planners and the community for enhancing the collaborative nature of water planning.

Download the Water Planning in the Gulf of Carpentaria Report (PDF, 1.13MB)

External Links

Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Water Gulf Plan

National Survey of Water Planners

As part of the Collaborative Water Planning research, we are currently conducting a survey of water planners nationally.

The findings from the survey will be used to inform the development of a tool-kit of current best practices to engage industry, Indigenous and rural communities in water planning, and a proposal for a training and development package.

These products will contribute to water planning nationally by setting guidelines and benchmarks to monitor and evaluate collaboration in water planning and by establishing clear procedures that integrate community preferences into water planning. The products will also contribute to regional water planning by assisting water agencies to improve water planning approaches; by helping to minimise conflicts between parties; by providing models and case studies for good collaboration; by helping develop stronger long-term relationships between stakeholders.

Survey Objectives

· Baseline state and national experience, expectations, issues and capacity gaps for collaborative planning

· Identify training needs and opportunities

· Explore common issues and identify exemplary approaches to public participation in water planning

· Inform the development of national guidelines for public participation in water planning

· Explore potential and need for specific capacity-building interventions for water planners

Download the Planner’s Survey…